Wednesday, June 29, 2011


While reading about how the media uses images from traumatic times to help the public overcome the stress, I thought of the opposite end of the spectrum and how manufactures' use images to have the public attach a particular event with a specific brand through advertising. While one is assisting in the grieving process and moving on through terrible events, the other is trying to create a bond between two ideas -- such as athletic success and Gaterade. We have all seen the commercials where the famous athletes such as the Williams sisters and Tiger Woods are sweating out Gaterade. Does this actually happen? I doubt it. But we are led to imagine that these successful athletes drink so much Geterade that they end up sweating it out when they preform. Just as we see all of the images from 9/11 and are reminded of the tragedies and atrocities that occurred, we see these athletes and are reminded of the Gaterade that they drink.

IMAGE ACTS....


9/11 changed the world in so many ways. Not only did my life change, but for the first time in many peoples lives, we began to actually feel fear. This is very common in a lot of other cultures and countries, but was not really in our lives. As a 12 year old, I know I had never been scared like that, and for most of the American public, it was the first time that a threatened feeling was really put into our minds. The picture of the towers actually falling represents so much to our country. It is in our history books and is an image I remember very well. Being from right outside the city, i could see the smoke and rubble from the top of the hill in the town I live in. I know many people who actually watched the towers fall from that hill.
I think the images from 9/11 are something that I consider generational. It's something we grew up and will pass on to our kids. This image of the plane hitting the second tower literally makes me cringe because it reminds us that we can be attacked, that we can be hurt. These events changed our history dramatically but also it has changed the way we are living on a day to day basis today. We wonder why the things that go on today involving the wars we are involved in, well a lot of it has to do with this image right here! THIS IMAGE ACTS! THIS IMAGE DOES THINGS!!!!

Photography, Journalism, and Trauma



In my final blog I wanted to write about Zelizer and her approach to the photos of 9/11 and the Holocaust. To me when I see images of these two events I can't help but imagine the day of 9/11. Obviously I can't think back to the Holocaust because I wasn't alive then but thinking back to 9/11 it is true that the photos continued to flow in day after day. Weeks after the event I was still seeing new photos of the planes and ground zero. When I think back I remember seeing the video of the planes crashing into the world trade centers that day but it was the newspaper that continually filled me in with new photos. This point is interesting because Zelizer states on page 50, "No wonder, then, that by the end of November one poll reported that the percentage of people watching network television had dropped dramatically, while those depending on the popular press for information had tripled from the first week after the attacks." This was very true in my case even though I was young because my mom is a reader of the daily press. I didn't notice that interesting little fact until reading this article. So to go on we read that pictures play a crucial role as tools to recovery Zelizer says. I can say that by seeing so many picture of 9/11 that now when I view these images they are iconic and I do not view them the same way as I did the year of the attacks. In one way or another images stand for something. They are a part of our life and without them we would have no physical evidence of past events. They also help us to get through difficult times, alleviating trauma which allows us to move on. There are many examples of this, not only the Holocaust and 9/11. Images do a lot more than we think they do for us. It could be pictures of a wrecked car from a drunk driving accident or something else of that sort that allow us to remember an unfortunate event and assist us moving forward in our lives.

Image Acts

As I was reading Photography, Journalism and Trauma....I could not stop thinking about all of the pictures I remember seeing in the news of what had happened on 9/11. Also because of my week 3 video, 9/11 and it's images have had me really thinking about how I feel when I am looking at the pictures. I found this article about how the Holocaust was not only image based but also documentary. It turns out that the documentaries had more of an impact on the viewers of this time than the still images. But for 9/11, the still images were viewed more than the videos of the planes crashing. It seemed that people responded more to the still images of seeing firefighters and ordinary people on the streets helping others to try to escape this disaster. The still, images really brought together our nation, people from all over the country were helping each other in a time of need. People felt the most devastated looking at these images or people of their country suffering.

Just learning about this made me think more about how much images really mean and what they say without words. A picture really is worth a 1000 words.

Here is the URL to where the article is: http://www.jstor.org/pss/4140708

framing


As someone who works in local news and is very familiar with local news, I can say with confidence that it is incredibly repetitive. When you're working only with a small market, even the most breaking of news events tend to have familiar players in a familiar issue. Yet as a resident of Buffalo, NY, the first thing that comes to my mind when thinking of comparative framing of different news stories is the Blizzard of 77... and every snowstorm that has followed.
In the same way that both the Holocaust and September 11 were reported on from most of the same angles with the same types of images, every major snowstorm has been treated like this in Buffalo since the Blizzard of 77. Storms are always related to the blizzard, and articles will always compare. Looking at the front page of the Buffalo News from that day, the same angles are all covered; how the Feds are reacting, how the community is reaching out, how a few heroes made a difference, and pictures of the mess. We can see this same storyline carried out for almost all disasters, from Katrina to earthquakes overseas. In the same way as the September 11 outline, this structure helps to lend a sense of normalcy during a time of crisis. It gives the viewer all of the expected starting points, and lets those who are affected know where to go from there.

Image Acts

Of the many great essays and articles we were assigned for this course, the one that I found most interesting is Image Acts. Many articles assigned reviewed different aspects of photographs, but Bakewell's (or is it Blakewell -- I saw it written both ways) theory really grabbed me.

How many photographs have we viewed in our lives? Hundreds, if not more. I am now looking at photographs in a different perspective. Have they had a purpose all along and I am now noticing?

I agree with her viewpoint that images are very important to the evolution of language. We view images in books and on tv before we learn to talk. Images can possibly be responsible in helping us to talk.

I like how she points out that images are powerful tools that have a purpose. They can change our emotion, anger us, and even reveal things about us.

Image acts have a purpose and a reason.

Promoting Change with Image Acts


The poster above is a very famous one that most of has seen printed or on TV. You read the statement on the left then look at the Native American on the right and think for a moment what is trying to be conveyed. Then you realize that the Native American represents America before all the development and now he is looking at it realizing that it has become littered with pollution and he is sad. This is a good example of what Liza Bakewell wrote an essay on where she defined what she terms an image act. It is roughly defined as referring to activities involving images. Some images promote different behavior or reactions on a person. The photo above was widely publicized as a PSA on not to litter and it did catch my attention. Blackwell writes, “the perception of what images do, if they are perceived to do anything of import at all, is varied. The question is whether the deeds of images are good or bad, harmful or not.” (p. 25). It helped me change my behavior and understand that littering is bad, but I have no idea how the campaign as a whole helped the country.



A more subtle image with a smaller targeted audience are bumper stickers. Take a look at the bumper sticker above. You initially see a bunch of dots and maybe get closer to read what the fine print is under it which says, “if you can read this, you’re way too close”. This is an image that does promote change, but to only to drivers and requires you to break do what it does not want you to do to get the message. The dots represent Braille and for anyone to read Braille you need to touch it. For you to touch it you obviously need be very close to it. So it is the intent of the bumper sticker to keep you farther back, but it backfires and makes you get closer. Once you get the message, you normally will adjust your behavior by not following too close. The sticker did the job in telling you what it wants and you will remember it since it was so unique, but to get the message you needed to do the opposite of what it says. So in this case in comparison to what Blackwell states “the deeds of the image is good” (p. 25), but could be harmful when trying to get the message.


These are two very different examples with a very different audience and audience size, but both do convey an image that gets one to think and react based on what they see.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Sean Bell: A Lesson in National Maturity

After reading the Trials and Tribulations of Rodney King essay, I immediately thought of a similar more recent case. That is the case of Sean Bell in New York City. For those of you unfamiliar, here is the wikipedia link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Bell_shooting_incident

The abridged version is that police were investigating in an area when Mr. Bell was "suspected" of reaching for a gun in his car. He was then shot and killed.

The murder of Sean Bell has been compared to the Rodney King beatings. However, in my opinion, the Sean Bell case shows a more blatant case of police not following protocol, and yet, the backlash was not nearly as much. When the police officers were acquitted in the Rodney King trial, it gave way to the L.A. Riots. However, when the officers were acquitted in the Sean Bell murder trial (including the one officer who fired 31 shots, meaning he needed to reload his weapon, even though Bell did not have a gun) the city mourned and got a street named after Bell. It appears as though our country has matured and displayed that maturity even in the face of an unbelievable unnecessary tragedy, a time when immaturity would certainly be understandable.

Just a kid from Long Island...


After reading Blakewell's essay on how images can "do" things, I couldn't agree more. I have a particular picture that hangs above the corner where I keep all of my gym stuff, and it happens to be the same one that is hanging above this post. For those of you not familiar with the man or picture above, he is Matt Serra, former UFC Welterweight Champion. Matt, like myself, is from Long Island and I currently study Brazilian Jiu-jitsu under him. I have always planned to get my degree, but after I graduate from Villanova, I plan to pursue a career in professional MMA. I have already competed in amateur fights and I know that this is something that I love and want to continue doing. But to get good at this sport a ton of time, effort, and determination is required. As much as I love it, there are days when I want to stop; days when I weigh the pros and cons of this being a valid life choice and really have to fight to stay on path. This picture stops me dead in my tracks. At one point in time, Matt Serra was just a kid from Long Island, like me, and he progressed into one of the best mixed martial artists in the world for a time. That could be me. Will it? I'm realistic, so probably not. But seeing this picture, the picture of a shocked and excited newly crowned world champion, and one that I know personally, motivates me every single day to put as much effort into this as I can to be the best I can be. I may want to take a day off from kickboxing - until I see this picture. I may decide I'm going to half-ass it at the gym one day - until I see this picture. One simple photograph does more to keep me motivated than any pseudo-Dr. Phil motivational speaker could ever do for me. Of course knowing the back story and having a personal relationship with the person in the photo makes it mean more to me than the average person, but it also speaks to the power of what an image can do.

Blakewell & Sontag-Facebook Pictures

Facebook immediately came to mind as I read Sontag’s essay on how photography is employed and also Blakewell’s theory of image acts. Over the past few years the photo application on Facebook has changed. At first you could only upload 60 pictures per album and it was a long and tedious process, now Facebook goes as far as recognizing faces in order to tag people in pictures and an unlimited amount of pictures can be uploaded. I look at some of my friends with over 200 albums and realize that they may be sharing too much and allowing Facebook pictures to represent their every day life. I feel that I am part of some of my friends’ lives not only by viewing their statuses but with the pictures that they constantly upload. Sontag discusses the idea about how photos become evidence in a manner that we upload them to this social networking website for our friends to see what we are doing. We have evidence in a sense of what vacation, party, or sports game we attended.

I also thought of Bakewell’s essay about image acts, as some photographs uploaded to Facebook are very powerful especially today with all of the users of social networking sites. “Images can flatter, promote, benefit, and better people, just as words can. They can also fight, accuse, denounce, and harm those same people” (Blakewell, 30). With the use of Facebook, we are not using verbal words to communicate to our friends but we are using images. Blakewell discusses how images can “reveal much about who we are: our class, gender, culture, age, personality, temperament, mood, and morals” (30). With all of this being on Facebook, through the images that users upload; Facebook users may be giving away too much information and employing photography in an inappropriate manner.

Monday, June 27, 2011

The Power of an Image



Liza Blakewell, in her essay, comments on the importance of image acts. An image act is the linking of a outcome or activity in response to a certain image. Blakewell writes, "For advertisers and their clients images are powerful tools, capable of persuading you to buy something, go somewhere, and be someone (else)"(25). There is truth to Blakewell's observations. Images are powerful. They can inspire, intimidate, or even raise a revolution. Blakewell claims that images are just as important to the evolution of language as written language. And I agree with her. Blakewell writes, "...the pounding of a shoe on a tabletop at a public meeting may sometimes be the only way to capture the world's attention, a certain face the only way to launch a thousand ships, a picture the only way to say something with fewer than a thousand words"(29). These are astute observations with their own merits. Perhaps the greatest part of the essay is Blakewell's embrace of not just image acts, but speech acts as well. There is a unification of the two, "These two systems of communication, as different as they are in practice, as separate and apart they often seem, are, in fact, in cahoots"(30).
The image I would first like to examine is the famous HOPE Barack Obama poster. This image can be used as an image act. It attempts to inspire the public to vote for a certain candidate. The union of the speech act, "HOPE," and the image act, Barack Obama's photo is inspring. This image inspires change, or attempts to. I would consider it an image act.
The second is an image taken during the Vietnam War. This photo is famous for inspiring more negative feedback from the public towards the Vietname War. It can be considered and image act cause it inspired a certain feeling of distrust and negativity between the United States government and its citizens.
Image acts inspire, and hold power. They are meant to inspire a reaction. I believe these images are powerful and just as important as speech acts.


Sunday, June 26, 2011

A Permanent Threat



I am currently an intern in a newspaper here in Ecuador so it was really interesting to read Barbie Zelizer’s Photography, Journalism and Trauma. Even tough there is not a traumatic even each day, thank God, it is still a very fast passed and tense environment in which you have to act quickly and make decisions on the spot. Photographs are obviously a major part of the newspaper because they are the one thing that every single reader can understand, so it is important to know which picture will speak for itself and cause an impression. Zelizer mentioned something really important which was that it is usually hard picking the right picture to go along with the story but it is even more difficult during a crisis or trauma. And ‘it is here that historical precedent becomes relevant. In the best of cases journalism involves the application of routine practices to unpredictable circumstances.one place from which to gain directives…is from earlier events in other times and places’, this is very curious because you would never think that one crisis could resemble another in almost anything. But what she means is that even though two events can be complete different like the example she presents between 9/11 and the Holocaust, they could still resemble the template of the latter one because it was that same collective sentiment of shock and horror that you are trying to evoke through the photograph.

I think that one of the first images that comes to my mind when I think of one of the most incredible and at the same time terrifying things I had ever seen. On October 11th, 1998, the volcano Guagua Pichincha erupted, and this is a volcano that is literally in the city. Thousands of people had to be evacuated, we were at my school and we could see it, and my school is not near the volcano at all. At the next day after the huge explosion had seized, it was amazing to see the image on the covers of newspapers. I feel that it does not follow the template of the Holocaust example, but I do feel that it followed the template of 9/11 in the sense that it made this one image of the volcano iconic and made everyone bear witness the event over again. This image became iconic insofar as it is a permanent reminder of how little control we can actually have, also the power of nature and the risk of living in a city so near to an active volcano.

A more recent example is the eruption of another volcano near Quito called Tungurahua. It is the most active of the volcanoes and recently it has been having a lot of explosion, I actually saw one the other week I went to a trip near it. Every time something like this happens the images of the volcanoes become very iconic because they remind us of their power to destroy and of how much damage they can cause.



Here is a link to see the recent activity of Tungurahua:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOYxQQxscUQ&feature=related

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Benjamin first states that mechanical reproduction "advanced intermittently and at leaps of long intervals, but with accelerated intensities" (218). By this he is referring to the work of photography and the concept of reproducing a unique image seen by the eye. He later expresses that there is an "aura" that is negatively impacted when mechanical reproduction is present. This "aura" is the originality of the work. It is no longer original once it is reproduced, but the aura represents nativeness and the genuineness of the picture.
An image that comes to mind for me is the Grand Canyon. I went about ten years ago and I was just beside myself when I was looking out into the valleys and how big it was. It really took your breath away knowing you were standing right in front of it and in a way it had an aura about it. There was this feel when I was there that expressed serenity and calmness and it was was one of those places where you had to be there to believe it. Now I do have pictures from that trip, but I look at them and just see different parts of the canyon and I really don't have a feeling toward them. It's almost like, "oh there's another picture of the canyon." There's no amazement or excitement I feel from looking at the pictures because being at the Grand Canyon, you can look for miles in the distance and see a lot and you can turn your head left and right it have a new view, but with a photograph, there is only a 4x6 space to look at and no turning to find a new view. I think this is what Benjamin is trying to described when he says that mechanical reproduction destroys the auras of images.

Thursday, June 23, 2011



For my final blog post for the class I wanted to bring attention to the way Zelizer described the photos we have all seen from September 11th and the concentration camps during the Holocaust as iconic. These photos have been in circulation for such a long time and have been seen by millions of people, each showing the tragedy of the times. Being able to recognize these photos at a glance without hesitation we are able to pinpoint when it is from and where it happened. This is exactly what makes a photo iconic but I also got to thinking about what makes other things iconic, is it: the subject? event? just repetition? artist behind the scenes? I came to the conclusion that it HAS to be a combination of all of these things because they all work hand in hand.
Then I thought about other images that are iconic in our society, for example, Marilyn Monroe from The Seven Year Itch, the Beatles walking across Abbey Road, Playboy bunny logo, and Andy Warhol's Campbell's soup can print, the Chanel logo, to name a few. Each image has gained it's reputation because of who's in the photo, what th
e image represents, a notable time period, the story behind it, or even just who created the image. The photos, people, or images society deems 'iconic' have done so over a period of time. Icons don't pop up overnight, it takes many eyes and minds to categorize something this way.
On a different level there are things certain individuals deem iconic, that society as a whole might not. This takes us back to the different ways people use photography and images to remember and cope. But still the iconic factor of something comes from the repetition, subject, etc. not matter the personal opinion behind it.

Invisible Adults

When I read Hirsch's article on presenting child victims, I thought of the Invisible Children campaign. One of the terrible things about this war is the use of child soldiers. This term "child soldier" just doesn't seem right at all. How can you make a child kill someone? I think that one reason that the Invisible Children campaign works so well is because it is relatable. College students and high school students are the same age as these children who are living very different lives halfway across the world. It makes us believe that something is wrong over there and it is our responsibility and duty to theses children to fix it or at least attempt to make it better. If Invisible Children had tried to present "Invisible Adults" I don't think that the response would have been as great because it would have lacked the relate-ability and drama associated with children.


Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Racism

From multiple classes in high school we would talk about racism and especially about schools and sports. Some people believe that it is racist to have an Indian mascot. (some other mascots are discussed but this is most popular). My high school mascot was a Lancer, a type of Indian that used to be where our community is. Our school chose to use them as a mascot in memory of them. But some people, (Indian race and others) think that it is racist and disagree with it...Here is a link of some of the disagreements: http://www.aimovement.org/ncrsm/

What do you think? Is it a honor or dishonor to be a mascot? How would you feel if you personally, or your race were a mascot for an University or school? How do you think it compares to animal mascots?....Just something to think about.

I think it is a honor to be remembered. And compared to animals...I don't think it could compare. I think mascots should be used symbolically for the school and community; to have some meaning or representation of who they are and what they are about. A mascot is a motivator and something to represent you and your school. I am proud to be a Lancer.

Mr. President, How Could You?



Take a look at the photo above. The president is ogling over the girl in the red dress right? Photos can be deceiving, especially still photos. With a still photo, there is no exact story being told with the photo by itself. It needs an interpreter to describe what the setting is and what the story is behind the photo. Photos and videos have a narrow viewpoint compared to being there watching it. Even being there watching it, you might see something someone else didn’t and the angle you are looking could be interpreted differently by another person. In the article from “The Trials and Tribulations of Rodney King “, Nichols writes that “no image can show intent or motivation” (p. 33). You might look at the photo above and speculate it was the intent of Obama to ogle over the girl. How did you come to that possible conclusion? You might make the following conclusions, Obama is a man and men like to gaze at pretty woman (as woman might say, men are pigs due to this behavior). He is also in the age range where he would be turned on by looking. The girl is wearing a bright red sleeveless dress, has bright curly flowing hair, has a great shape, and would catch the eye of many men. You might think, as the president, he does not have a lot of time for many private, personal encounters with his wife and in-turn is on a heightened state of awareness to a beautiful woman passing by.

This type of speculation or guessing is what Nichols defines as “algebra of probability” often referred to as “street smarts” (p. 35). “Using such an algebra requires an ability to develop and follow tacit conventions describing the boundaries of a discrete situation or event, character types, their usual behavior, the motivations and intentions governing specific encounters and their likely result” (p. 35). This “algebra of probability” can often get police into trouble when encountering a perpetrator. If the police have a shootout and fight at the end of a car chase every time the person is a black male, they will come to the conclusion that is probably going to happen this time too. Many times it does happen, but sometimes it does not and that is when cops get into trouble. Just like the photo above, guessing what happens based on your street smarts might lead you to the wrong conclusion.

With all that in mind, take a look at the video.

Still convinced that Obama was ogling? Video shows more and has audio, but the view is still small and it still needs some narration by the broadcaster. Without someone pointing anything out, would you have known to look for anything at all?

Lastly, regarding Nichols claim. Can you capture intent and motivation on camera? I say yes, as long as it does not involve a human. For a human, intent and motivation are thoughts that cannot be seen or read. Humans can also change their initial intent or motivation at the last possible moment. Animals on the other hand don’t have that switch unless something goes wrong physically with them. Take a look at the photo below. What is the intent of the cheetah? It is obvious that the cheetah intends to kill and eat the gazelle and is motivated by instinct and a hungry stomach. The cheetah is not going to chase down a gazelle for fun and it won’t stop unless he catches it or something goes physically wrong. Something like he got too tired, he broke a leg, he fell in a hole, etc. One might argue that since intent and motivation are thoughts and emotions, then humans are the only one that has them and it does not apply to the animal world. But that is a different argument to have.

Rodney King

I decided to blog about Rodney King this week. I was almost 20 when this event occurred in LA, yet can barely recall the specifics. My husband who is a few years older than I could only recall a few facts from the trial.

I found The Trials and Tribulations article very interesting. I can vaguely recall the video being shown on the news and hearing about the riots in LA. Among the many things I learned from the article, I never knew the amateur video did not record the entire event. As horrible an event it was, I found myself wanting to research the event more.

I am sure to many in 1991, it was to be a quick open and shut case, yet it wasn’t. George Holliday, a man awakened by the commotion outside his apartment taped only one and half minutes of the beating. This was surely enough evidence to prove that these LA police officers were all guilty, yet it didn’t. This certainly proves the point made in the article that no image can show intent or motivation.

I found this article interesting and informative. Good pick.

photo evidence.

The different ways mentioned in the Sontag article regarding how photography is used reminded me in particular of Facebook. As photography becomes increasingly mainstream, more photographers look for a way to share their photos, and therein their experiences with their friends. It can, however, cross a line from sharing to becoming an integral part of life.
From my own experience, I've watched the photo sharing application of Facebook change from good to questionable. When we were high school, and Facebook was brand new, photo albums were slow to upload and could only contain 60 pictures maximum. Most people my age didn't have their own digital cameras, so pictures were mostly limited to special events and vacations, similar to photographs in the past. Eventually, picture messaging became common, and mobile uploading began. With mobile uploads, people could document instantaneous moments whenever their cell phone was handy. Album limits were removed, and everyday events became public domain.
With these changes, it became as though events had to be photographed as evidence that you were there. If there are pictures of an event that you attended, and you weren’t tagged in any photographs, you might as well not have gone. A photographical timeline of high school and college began to emerge for all of your Facebook friends to peruse, as a glimpse into not only the special events in one’s life, but also the personal moments captured by mobile uploads.
This is something that is touched on in the article; the idea that photographs are evidence. The influence of Facebook has taken this one step further, that the pictures are an integral part of an event, and there is this visual log of everyone’s activities. Social networking sites have increasingly adapted this mobile uploading feature as it has become more widely used, through photo tweets and programs such as Instagram. There are upsides to this way of social networking as well; in the way that photographs can show actual moments instead of simply describing them, we can update our friends without words, giving them actual glimpses into our activities through photographs that we choose to share.

Projected Memory



In this past reading Hirsch discusses the relationship we have to the suffering of others via photographs. I found this writing very interesting and could not help but think of the people of Japan after reading Hirsch. How she describes the way we feel towards others we do not even know is extremely accurate and had me thinking. At first I didn't think I felt this way until I went online to find some of the devastating picture from the earthquake in Japan. Once I searched for pictures things such as the picture here appeared. Just seeing the destruction from the earthquake made me instantly feel sick. We take so much for granted every day without realizing how lucky we are. Then as the search continued I began to come across pictures of children and families. This is when I realized that Hirsch was spot on with what she had said in her writing. Seeing pictures of children, helpless and without a home made me instantly feel for as i imaged myself in that situation as a child or seeing my little brother in those circumstances. These images can not help but have us create a connection in one way or another. However, this natural destruction made me make a connection with Hirsch's writing and we can see through these images how powerful pictures and images can be in everyday life.



Understanding Hirsch

Joplin-Missouri-Tornado-Video.jpg
As I read the reading from Hirsch, I found it a little difficult to find an experience that has happened to me like the one she describes in her reading. The worst natural disaster that has occurred is that the Delaware River overflowed and ruined many houses close to and far as well from the River. Hirsch argues that photographs are problematic and I believe she states this because pictures taken of natural disasters cause a sense of discomfort and when we see them, we feel bad for the people affected by it. She also describes this concept of postmemory, which is looking at photos and automatically thinking of something similar to that, but it is not exactly initiated with yourself. With this, I then thought of tornadoes and earthquakes. There have been many tornadoes and earthquakes mainly in the midwest, but recently there was a earthquake in Philadelphia, about 40 minutes away from me. It was not severe, but it had me thinking, that this could happen to anyone. This is where the postmemory kicked in. The picture is of a tornado from Missouri that just occurred recently. It automatically made me think of the earthquake/tornado near me that happened and how it could have been actually severe. It didn't actually happen to me, but since it was so close, I feel like it almost did. This just shows the power that pictures have on peoples minds.